Hawkular APM seems good indeed (better than BTM)

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Gary Brown <gbrown@redhat.com> wrote:


----- Original Message -----
> What about:
>
> Hawkular Application Analytics: hawkular-app-analytics (It's part of the APM)
>

The fact that it is part of the conceptual framework definition for APM, along with Business Transactions, makes a more compelling case to use APM :)

I think it also means we could explore more of the analytics angle in the future. But if we were to use the analytics name in the project title, it would be as limiting/misleading as the BTM name has turned out to be.

> Pavol
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Segismont < tsegismo@redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-05-27 11:07 GMT+02:00 Gary Brown < gbrown@redhat.com > :
>
>
> 1) Is a component rename a good idea?
>
> I believe so.
>
>
>
> 2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that
> encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated name
> (but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular
> components).
>
> To me Hawkular APM would be good (in long and short form)
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev