Yes, yes, we know it's far from perfect :)††
Just can't yet get the bandwidth to do that schema review...
On 5/10/2016 4:42 PM, John Sanda wrote:
Juca,† I think Lucas is
correct, Alerts has the multi-tenancy model built in and
so requires a tenantId on everything.†† We already have
a standalone distribution (for use outside of Hawkular)
that drives off of the Hawkular-Tenant header, so I
guess we would just continue to use that mechanism in
all cases.† I guess that means we may drop the
h-accounts dependency but I will discuss further with
Lucas and we'll continue to monitor the accounts
Lucas, this may further drive the need for schema
refactoring because if we only receive a single tenant
on everything coming from MIQ, we will get very little
Iíve said it in the past and itís worth mentioning again.
Even with multiple tenants, you should be partitioning by more
than just tenant.
hawkular-dev mailing list