1. share the same grid cache between the master and the slaves

Infinispan has a flat structure. The key has to contain:
 - the index name
 - the chunk name 
Both with essentially be the unique identifier. 

I suppose in this idea all indexes are stored in a one single grid. What about one Infinispan grid per directory, similarly to RAMDirectory or FSDirectory? IMHO it could make some simplifications i.e. in metadata or key names. 
Are there any Infinispan drawbacks to have a high number of caches in the network? Sharing JGroups channels can help in that?

_
Lukasz
 

2009/7/9 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel@hibernate.org>

On  Jul 9, 2009, at 16:16, Manik Surtani wrote:


In the case of replication, make sure a FD back end can be activated in case the grid goes to the unreachable clouds of total inactivity.

FD backend?  I presume you mean a cache store.  Have a look at the different cache stores we ship with, I reckon a FileCacheStore would do the trick for you.

http://infinispan.sourceforge.net/4.0/apidocs/org/infinispan/loaders/CacheStore.html
http://infinispan.sourceforge.net/4.0/apidocs/org/infinispan/loaders/file/FileCacheStore.html

Yes I meant FS as FileSystem, but any backend would do (though DB would be a bad choice).

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev