Let's keep it but with a documentation to remove it later.
On 5 mars 2012, at 23:01, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
Emmanuel, shall I remove my guards against double initialization from
the pull request, or shall we keep them to keep compatibility with
Hibernate ORM 4.0.x ?
On 5 March 2012 20:51, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> On Mon 05 Mar 2012 08:52:53 AM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> Looks like a bad application of the changes y'all pushed earlier
>> adding what is now at line 162 (the
>> ServiceBinding.ServiceLifecycleOwner stuff). Line 163 just needs to go
>> away AFAICT
>> On Mon 05 Mar 2012 06:25:43 AM CST, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> Quoting Sanne, we discovered that services are started twice by
>>> Hibernate ORM. Is that expected that the service guards against that,
>>> or is there some issue somewhere either in ORM or in the way OGM
>>> declares services?
>>>> While looking at this I also noticed the service was actually
>>>> started twice;
>>>> Looking into Hibernate Core that seems to be the behaviour for all
>>>> line 162 and 163 at:
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev mailing list