Note: this issue is here to track something we should fix in ORM.
Original discussion about this issue: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2017-February/015851.html
Currently, it's not possible for ORM to make a difference between:
- no BV implementation is present
- the BV implementation has failed to start
This leads to the following situation: when validation-mode is set to AUTO (which is the default), if the BV implementation failed to start, you won't see any error.
Gunnar introduced the NoProviderFoundException in BV 2.0 to be able to pass the information that no implementation has been found and differentiate the 2 cases.
This should be taken into account in ORM, namely in TypeSafeActivator. |
|
