Currently associations are mapped to Redis with the hash dialect using native Redis lists etc. This is kind of nice, but I feel we should reconsider how the identifiers of these lists are built. Currently we have the association table name in there, but I think using the entity name "on this side" of an association makes more sense. E.g. like this:

JUG:123:members

instead of

JUG_Members:123:members

Alternatively, a purely "table"-based mapping as done for ISPN and Ehcache could make sense.