I mean "manual review and approval stamping". It's meant as a QA step before going final because there are still some glitches e.g. in the mapping for Neo4j.

Would be good to describe what the requirements are to be stamped "sensible and correct"

+1. One rule for me is the principle of least surprise for the users of a store, i.e. they should have the impression of a natural mapping which makes use of the store's typical patterns and idioms. We also plan to create a document with mapping guidelines to which dialect authors can refer to.