We recently did an upgrade from Hibernate 5.3.16 to Hibernate 5.4.14 inside one of our applications. One of our enitity has a foreign key relationship inside its own table, and additionally uses discriminators for that table. Basically we execute the following update statement:
update OpdrachtPlan o set o.plan.id = :newPlanId where o.plan.id = :planId and o.isProCalc = false and o.maand >= :datum
Hibernate 5.4.14 generates the following (invalid) SQL statement for this query:
update
SDOPDR cross
join
set
PKSDOPDRREF=?
where
(
SDOPDRPROCALC = 0
)
and PKSDOPDRREF=?
and SDOPDRPROCALC=false
and SDOPDRMND>=?
In the previous Hibernate 5.3.16, we got the following SQL statement, which works correctly:
update
SDOPDR
set
FKSDOPDR_OPDRREF_MASTER=?
where
(
SDOPDRPROCALC = 0
)
and FKSDOPDR_OPDRREF_MASTER=?
and SDOPDRPROCALC=false
and SDOPDRMND>=?
Based on my investigation, this issue appears to be introduced by multiple changes: HHH-13875: the addition of the isNull check inside dereferenceEntity causes that we don't get inside the isPropertyEmbeddedInJoinProperties method anymore, which is necessary. This would have been sufficient if we named our primary keys id instead of objectId. As part of our investigation we then downgraded to 5.4.12 which didn't contain this patch. The combination of HHH-12842 Closed and HHH-12775 Closed prevents that the objectId path is properly registered inside AbstractPropertyMapping.initIdentifierPropertyPaths(). As an attachment, you can find a number of traces of the AST of SQL, HBM, loggings of the mapping and the SQL statement itself. I don't know what would be the best solution to solve this bug, I did however make a stripped down test case to reproduce this: hibernate-test-case-templates.zip |