+1 for "for"
Looks good and leaves options open for value
Michael, if you happen to review that pull could you fix the javadoc for for as well? I don't think current wording makes sense, especially the "Javabean property name" as it's not referring to that just to the default Spatial annotation.
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
+1 for "for"
Looks good and leaves options open for value
Michael, if you happen to review that pull could you fix the javadoc for for as well? I don't think current wording makes sense, especially the "Javabean property name" as it's not referring to that just to the default Spatial annotation.