I am assuming, for now, that a naming strategy will not be used to generate foreign key names.
If the foreign or unique key name is not mapped, then they will be generated using hash codes as is currently done in the old "mapping" metadata.
I am assuming, for now, that a naming strategy will not be used to generate foreign key names.
If the foreign or unique key name is not mapped, then they will be generated using hash codes as is currently done in the old "mapping" metadata.