|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
As we discussed on IRC I dont think this is correct. I think what we do now in terms of persistenceUnitExcludeUnlistedClassesValue handling is correct.
Perhaps we are scanning nested artifacts more aggressively than we should (or more so than the old scanner code)?