Shawn, that would be awesome. Hopefully, someone from the DEV team answers but I doubt it. This bug has been opened since 2006!

In my case I don't need to do anything under the failure condition, I guess (1) would be easier but I understand that other people might be using it in a different way. Let's wait and see if someone else adds something...

Anyways, if you find a way to do (1) or (2) I would be glad to test it with my own code.