+1

On Jan 4, 2012 9:26 AM, "Galder Zamarreño" <galder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> >
> > On 3 Jan 2012, at 15:40, Mircea Markus wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> So the idea is in the future to avoid checking for flags in the
> >>> context but rather look in the command directly? So that we can avoid
> >>> copying them in the invocation context.
> >> can't we just drop the flags from the invocation context entirely?
> >
> > That would involve changing quite a lot of code, wouldn't it?
>
> Indeed but I had no plans to do this in time for 5.1, it's too short notice and too bigger risk. Something for 5.2 IMO.
>
> What we can do is apply the suggested change in the pull req to fix the issue at hand, and leave further changes that we all seem to agree on for 5.2.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> >
> > --
> > Manik Surtani
> > manik@jboss.org
> > twitter.com/maniksurtani
> >
> > Lead, Infinispan
> > http://www.infinispan.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev