I would like to try it in combination with the Lucene Directory, wich uses two or three different caches per index.

Even better this way. I would like to hear more about your reasoning behind using DT on per-cache basis. Yes, it would be simpler and easier API for the users but we do not cover uses cases when distributed task execution needs access to more than one cache during its execution....

I was just wondering whether such a use case exists or whether we're just inventing stuff. :-) It would lead to a much more cumbersome API since you'd need to provide a map of cache names to keys, etc.

>
> On 10-12-16 9:07 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hmm. Maybe it is better to not involve an ...

--
Manik Surtani
manik@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.o...

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev