Yeah I think it is useful to share knowledge like this.

On 3 Dec 2010, at 16:39, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:

Excellent!! We should provide short summaries of all non-trivial fixes just as you did here! 

On 10-12-03 11:58 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
Mircea's initial fix [1] for ISPN-777 was on the right track but incomplete, as witnessed by comments here [2]:

I've made a few more changes [3] to this which will now be in 4.2.0.CR3.  Anyway, the purpose of this email is to summarise my changes:

* Transactions self-destructing was only present on LockingInterceptor.visitLockControlCommand() [4].  This should also be on visiting prepare commands since this is the other place that locks can be acquired and a remote node disappearing.
* The check above is still not enough.  There is a race between conducting the check on a transaction and actually acquiring a lock.  E.g., a remote transaction may seem valid in [4] but by the time the thread acquires the lock, the node could have died rendering its transaction stale.  For this purpose, I have added a validity field to RemoteTransaction [5] which is flagged whenever a RollbackCommand is invoked [6] [7].  This allows the stale transaction cleanup task to flag such transactions as invalid even if they are being processed on the fly.  Finally, I have a check for this flag whenever locks are acquired and entries written to [8] and appropriate lock release if this is the case [9].
* I've also added a stress test that demonstrates this problem better (much more repeatable), based on the original test submitted by the reporter.
* Some other minor tweaks like better logging and toString() impls.  :-)

Cheers
Manik

--
Manik Surtani
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache




_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


--
Manik Surtani
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache