Sanne, 

+1 to consistency.  I suggest we repurpose https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1429 to a consistent logging scheme.  My preference is for a static final boolean trace = log.isTraceEnabled().

But I do see Erik's concerns about wanting to switch on tracing on the fly.

- Manik

On 7 Dec 2011, at 13:45, Sanne Grinovero wrote:

On 7 December 2011 13:38, Erik Salter (esalter) <esalter@cisco.com> wrote:
+1 in trace log consistency.  We've noticed this in trying to gather
logs in running down bugs.  I'd rather NOT have to restart, since most
of the problems I need trace logs for don't show up until a system has
been running for a while.

Regards,

Erik

thanks Erik, you make a good point. But those logs which are currently
using a constant likely need to stay as they are, as they would
otherwise slow down significantly, so while I'm voting for consistency
I wouldn't like to go in that direction :)
We need an agent, I see no other solution.

Sanne

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

--
Manik Surtani
manik@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org