Galder, Manik, the jira you mention is ISPN-3140 JMX operation to
suppress state transfer [1], implemented quite a long time ago. This
should solve the problem of many simultaneous joiners. Does this fit
your needs?

[1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3140

On 01/23/2015 06:10 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hey Manik, I think I remember some JIRA to have a state transfer manually, upon management operation or similar, in order to avoid state transfer mayhem when bringing a lot of nodes at the same time. I don’t know what’s happened to that, but would it work?
>
> Cheers,
>
> On 17 Jan 2015, at 02:43, Manik Surtani <manik@infinispan.org> wrote:
>
>> Greetings. :-)
>>
>> I chatted with a few of you offline about this earlier; anyone has any thoughts around a ClusterLoader implementation that, instead of broadcasting to the entire cluster, unicasts to the owners of a given key by inspecting the DistributionManager. Thinking of using this as a lazy/on-demand form of state transfer in a distributed cluster, so joiners don’t trigger big chunks of data moving around eagerly.
>>
>>      • M
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> galder@redhat.com
> twitter.com/galderz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev