Hey Sebastian,

I completely agree that hosting [1] in the /rest context is superior to [2]. I think that is what you are proposing, right? :-)

Thanks,

Alan

---

From: "Sebastian Laskawiec" <slaskawi@redhat.com>
To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:10:40 AM
Subject: [infinispan-dev] REST content directory

Hey,

A while ago I noticed that we have static directory with some information about REST interface in the feature pack [1]. The directory is put in the server distribution ($ISPN_HOME/rest). 

Our REST server doesn't host those files when accessing /rest context. We host [2] in this scenario. Those two web pages differ from each other and I must admit, that [1] is much better.

I would like to propose removing [1] from the feature pack and serving it in the /rest context. Would you agree?

Thanks,

Sebastian

[1] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/integration/feature-pack/src/main/resources/content/rest

[2] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/rest/src/main/resources

--

SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC

INFINISPAN DEVELOPER

Red Hat EMEA

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev