Fair point... ok, let's leave it as it is now.


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Galder Zamarreño <galder@redhat.com> wrote:


On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys
>
> CacheLoaderInterceptor and DistributionInterceptor both honour the IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES flag for get commands, but I think it would be more useful if they ignored it - just like they ignore it for conditional commands.
>
> That would make it possible for users to only keep a reference to a cache.getAdvancedCache().withFlags(IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES) and use it for both read and write operations.
>
> What do you think?

If I was to take the role of a colleague of the person who's written the Infinispan code, it'd be very confused to see a cache reference created with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES being used for a get() operation… I can see myself thinking: "Why on earth do you call get with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES?"

>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


--
Galder Zamarreño
galder@redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz

Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io

Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev