On 15 May 2012, at 17:21, Manik Surtani wrote:


On 15 May 2012, at 17:10, Galder Zamarreņo wrote:

You have not yet given me a single reason why we should put back something that's flawed. All you've said is: i rely on X and I want it back.

Well, the old scheme was broken and there are several good reasons why we moved to a more consistent approach.  

Diego, can't your work be modified to work with the new schemes?

+1