On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Galder Zamarreņo wrote:

On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:

On 18 Jan 2011, at 16:17, Pete Muir wrote:

12) http://community.jboss.org/wiki/InfinispanInteractiveTutorialwithScala

For "Cache with Transaction Management" I was not seeing TX semantics being obeyed, I saw the size increment as a added key-value pairs

which cache operation?
I imagine the size only increments within the transaction context? i.e. if you suspend the uncommitted transaction and run the same operation again, you don't see transaction's modifications.  

Galder, this as well?

I'll check it out.

I created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-882 - This behaviour is like this since since we accepted (Mircea?) the following community bug report: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-679

Can we get an agreement on this? I think it should work as it did originally.