On 11-01-05 3:39 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:



Awesome! I love this fluent API proposal!


Cool.  Then if this is the case lets stick with the fluent API - I think it would make life much easier for developers.

--
Manik Surtani


Proposal Manik and I talked about is here https://github.com/vblagoje/infinispan/commit/59b0c3cb78bce70fdcd49d2d36f68de110944fc6

I have slightly changed it to better match map/reduce paradigm described here http://labs.google.com/papers/mapreduce.html
Therefore, we now have both map/reduce and a more simple "execute this task unit on remote nodes and return results" proposal.
Users might not like number of type parameters in MapReduceTask. I wanted to be as precise as possible to begin with and we can discuss how and if to reduce them.
Example for map/reduce is WordCountExample.java. Have a look.

I put a proposal in distexec package. I wanted to have parent package to branch from. We need to accommodate simple execution model, map/reduce, various execution policies and so on. They could not fit all in mapreduce package and its children. Hence distexec package. If you think you have better name - speak up.


Regards,
Vladimir