Hi Galder,<br><br>I looked at the preliminary writeup for the New Fine Grained Replication API Design at<br><a href="http://community.jboss.org/wiki/newfinegrainedreplicationapidesign">http://community.jboss.org/wiki/newfinegrainedreplicationapidesign</a><br>
<br>When compared to the POJOCache does this design mandate an explicit &quot;commit&quot; (seems true because of the JPA style) to change the object instance stored in the cache/ replicated? If yes this design would NOT provide an exact replacement for the POJOCache style APIs and the included flexibility.<br>
<br>Could you clarify - did I miss something while reading the text.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Kapil