Hi,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:00, Galder Zamarreņo <galder@redhat.com> wrote:

On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote:

Hi,

Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some other were made, so here's my plan of action.

Each of the following benchmarks will be run on local, distributed and replicated caches:

1. non transactional: web session replication[1]

2. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): web session replication[2]

3. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): tpcc [3]

The difference between 2 and 3 is the fact that 3 induces some key contention between transactions.

Any other suggestion for benchmarking?

Could it be interesting to see what the autoCommit penalty is? i.e. comparing: non-transactional cache vs transactional cache with autoCommit

Pure Transactional and autoCommit 'off' does not work in BETA 5. I am
compiling a list of changes I made to make it happen.

To save you the trouble of going through what I did and give you a
solution that 'works'.