It'd be interesting to hear what the rest have to say, but I haven't seen JDBM much in use in the forums.
Clearly JDBM based cache stores compete with FileCacheStore, so if you're interested in integrating JDBM2, you might wanna investigate what it brings different/better as opposed to FCS.
That might be key to transforming current FCS usages (i.e AS6 EJB3 SFSB passivation) to JDBM2.
On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Elias Ross wrote:
Now that I left my old company, I might be able to work on integrating this.
But is there still any interest in JDBM? Does it actually get used?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jan Kotek <opencoeli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM
Subject: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release
To: jdbm-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, jdbm-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is fork of 1.0,
which integrates most of patches developed in here.
It is faster and more space efficient than older release.
home page:
http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/
announcement:
http://www.kotek.net/blog/jdbm2_released
Regards,
Jan Kotek
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreņo
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev