This would only affect the Cache internals (use two DataContainers instead of one). Users still won't have direct access to the L1 cache.



On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:24 PM, cotton-ben <ben.cotton@alumni.rutgers.edu> wrote:

Instinctively, this is a very attractive idea.

Would the L1 data container be a "separate, but equal" container?  i.e.
would it be  a separate instance from the DIST_SYNC cache but the exact same
data structure?

or

Would the L1 data container be "separate, and different" container?  i.e.
would it be a completely different data structure (and API) from the
DIST_SYNC cache?





--
View this message in context: http://infinispan-developer-list.980875.n3.nabble.com/infinispan-dev-L1-Data-Container-tp4027447p4027449.html
Sent from the Infinispan Developer List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev