Hi all,
with Pedro we have been reasoning on the integration of TO-based
replication protocols, and a few questions popped out.
We may be missing something here, but it seems that the current
NBST implementation is still not providing support for pending
transactions, namely transactions that are prepared but not yet
committed at the time in which the node receives a state
transfer request. We have tried to figure out how you plan to do
this by checking the design document:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/Non-BlockingStateTransferV2
but we still have some doubts. The relevant extract seems to be
the following:
1.3 For new segments, it asks one of the current owners
(the donor) for the transactions and locks.
1.4 The donor only replies with the transactions and locks
after it has installed the new toplogy. We need this to make
sure a proper pending CH is also installed on the donor and
request forwarding to the new pending owners is in place
(forwarding is explained in request handling section).
1.5 The transactions and locks are applied on acceptor.
1.6 The acceptor requests new data segments from donor
asynchronously.
1.7 Unblock all incoming commands. We are now prepared to
process commands although some data segments are still flowing
in.
In point 1.7, you say that you can already process commands for
data segments that a node has not received yet. However, if the
command is, say, a prepare for a key in a missing data segment
and the transaction is requesting a validation (write-skew
check), you would still need to block as you need the most
updated data version to validate it. Are we getting it right?
Also, it seems that point 1.5 has not been coded yet. We are
asking this, as these functionalities are likely to be useful
also for the NBST version used by TO-based replication
protocols. Thus, it'd probably be better to wait for these parts
to be stable and re-use them, instead than implementing them
from scratch and end-up possibly with conflicting/incompatible
implementations. When do you plan to have this functionality
implemented?
Finally, I wanted to point out that Roberto and Sebastiano have
been thinking about an alternative version of the NBST, which
should further reduce the blocking time of transactions. They're
currently still at the design stage, and are working to prepare
a document that we would like to share with you to get
feedback/comments etc. We plan to have a draft of the algorithm
by Sept. 20.
Cheers,
Paolo
PS: I'll be travelling starting tomorrow and during next week,
so I may not be responding to emails very quickly.
On 7/25/12 12:16 PM, Dan Berindei wrote: