Very nice!<br>All my previous tests also confirm that there is a correlation between PUT and GET performance, when one increases the other goes down.<br><br>These PUT operations are doing a GET as well, correct? I&#39;d love to see such graphs using SKIP_REMOTE_LOOKUP.<br>

How long are you warming up the VM? As mentioned in the other thread, I&#39;ve discovered that even under high load it will take more than 15 minutes before all of Infinispan&#39;s code is running in compiled mode.<br><br>

Cheers,<br>Sanne<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 26 January 2012 17:58, Mircea Markus <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mircea.markus@jboss.com">mircea.markus@jboss.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div>As discussed on another thread, I&#39;ve hacked the remote get to only go to a single node. The performance of put almost doubled, whilst the one of gets decreased by about 10 percent.<div>

The performance decrease for gets is understandable, but I can&#39;t really understand why the write got so very fast. The OOB thread pool is not shared between the writes and the reads...</div><div>That makes me think that there might be a contention point between OOB and regular threads?</div>

<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Mircea</div><div><div><br></div><div> <img src="cid:DBD47956-3328-4C83-8FA9-08A996E93DB4@home" height="768" width="1024"><img src="cid:CA127710-B421-4158-8E79-C9E05833FDD5@home" height="768" width="1024"></div>

</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
infinispan-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org">infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br>