Ran into this again, so created
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-8947 to track this.
-Jaikiran
On Monday 07 February 2011 06:43 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
While integrating EJB3 service into current AS
trunk, I noticed that if a Component's service (or any service in
general) has unresolved dependencies, although the service stays in
DOWN state (as expected), no error is reported and the deployment does
*not* fail. As a side effect of this, a runtime invocation on the
service (a InitialContext.lookup() leading to the
ServiceReferenceObjectFactory.getObjectInstance() in this case) ended
up hanging indefinitely http://pastebin.com/jK0i1aCi
To debug this, I had to use jconsole and then get a list of all the
services, their dependencies and the state and then figure out what's
missing:
Service
"jboss.deployment.unit.ejb3-example.jar.component.SimpleStatelessSessionBean"
(class
org.jboss.as.ee.component.service.ComponentService) mode ACTIVE
state DOWN (dependencies:
jboss.naming.context.java.module.ejb3-example.jar,
jboss.naming.context.java.app.ejb3-example.jar,
jboss.naming.context.java.comp.ejb3-example.jar.SimpleStatelessSessionBean,
jboss.naming.context.java.global."ejb3-example/SimpleStatelessSessionBean!org.jboss.as.demos.ejb3.archive.SimpleStatelessSessionLocal")
(has
missing dependency)
Shouldn't a unresolved dependency on a service result in deployment
failure?
-Jaikiran
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev