I think this makes sense, at least initially.
We should probably do some performance testing on it at some point
though, from some AS7 weld benchmarks that I have seen in the past the
EL implementation was often the bottle neck.
I know JUEL is often touted as a much faster implementation, but I don't
know if there are any plans to make it EL 3 compliant.
Stuart
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reviewed EL 3, and I believe the RI looks more than acceptable
> (license is GPL+CDDL - as usual, I think -, with good quality).
>
> The new spec sources (
> https://java.net/projects/el-spec/sources/source-code/show/trunk/api/src/main/java/javax/el
> ) could be imported in the EE specs repository (there is no other
> compatible EL 3 implementation, so no need to edit or change the
> ExpressionFactory implementation loading mechanism), while the
> implementation could be used directly as an external dependency, at
> least for the time being.
>
> Comments ?
>
> Rémy
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev