Just found a related comment on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-803 :

"The current failsafe verification could be modified to consider results for multiple executions."

That sounds like it would not work as it is now.
See the discussion at jira. More info later.

Ondra

Ondřej Žižka píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 17:47 +0100:

Ondřej Žižka píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 17:19 +0100:

Hi all,

Do we have any experience with Maven Failsafe plugin?
It's like surefire, but the test process is split to two goals: running tests and checking the results.

To save you from some searching:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/integration-test-mojo.html
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html
They're bound to different phases by default. Which leads me to:

Would it solve our "two executions" problem? Are there some gotchas?

Additional info from John Casey:

(17:07:11) OndrejZizka: Is new functionality added to surefire automatically added to failsafe too?
(17:07:17) OndrejZizka: like, groups, for instance
(17:07:27) OndrejZizka: and support for newer junit etc
(17:07:57) jdcasey: you mean code-wise? yeah, I think so
(17:08:21) jdcasey: they made a huge effort not long ago to synchronize those plugins, and IIRC they're in the same codebase in SVN now

Regards,
Ondra

Ondřej Žižka píše v Pá 02. 12. 2011 v 06:47 +0100:

1-3) is currently done by a combination of modules and Surefire executions.
The problem with the later is that a failure in one execution prevents the successive from running.
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev