Hi all,

the AS public API javadoc is generated by scripts which follow the logic discussed earlier. In short, these are the rules for inclusion:

* All modules NOT marked with   <property name="jboss.api" value="private"/>
* Their     <dependencies>  which are NOT marked with  <property name="jboss.api" value="private"/>
* "unsupported" is treated the same as "private"
* All this is merged using union.  I.e. if something is marked as private, but exposed as a non-private dependency of a non-private module, it's included.

Is the last point ok? It leads to various jars included which would make more sense if not included.
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-10099
Perhaps a module marked private should override exposed deps?

Thanks,
Ondra