Does this make sense?
remote-destination... -> localhost?
[standalone@localhost:9999 /] /socket-binding-group=standard-sockets/remote-destination-outbound-socket-binding=mail-smtp:read-resource
{
"outcome" => "success",
"result" => {
"fixed-source-port" => false,
"host" => "localhost",
"port" => 25
}
}
In general, why do we have "remote-destination-outbound-socket-binding" and "local-destination-outbound-socket-binding"?
Seems pretty awkward to me. Both the name and the separation.
Why not:
outbound-socket-binding {type=<local/remote>} ?
Ike