The CLI offers low level DMR operation, which offer a lot
more possibilities
then the CLI's it's high level commands.
If compare the web interface and the CLI, compare the CLI
high level commands to the
web interface. On this level they should remain synced as
much as possible.
I am not objecting to implement any nitty gritty dada source
configuration option,
but we need to get the priorities straight. Therefore I'd say
let's focus on the frequently used
features for sysadmins and developers.
IMO it's fine with to point users to the the CLI for more
fine grained configuration options.
("the good of the many outweighs the good of the few").
Ike
On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Vimal Kansal wrote:
However, this may lead to an
inconsistency of sorts, as using CLI when you execute
:read-resource, you get to see all the configured
properties, but when you use UI, you will see only a subset.
I am not sure, how appropriate it would be to have this
inconsistency.