Hi all,
so far I have tested the following options:
>I don’t think so (although I haven’t tried it). This is because your mgmt-user.properties file has no >users listed.
No, even after adding an user (with the add-user.cmd command) still no authentication required by CLI

>>>> @Wondering if that works for the console as well?
Yes the http console issues a BASIC authentication popup.

>>>> AFAIK the CLI checks if you are on localhost. In that case the authentication is not
>>>> required.
I've checked binding server and management interface to another IP address available on my card and still no authentication requested by CLI

The only test I'm missing at the moment is connecting to a remote AS instance.

Regards
Francesco

2011/11/23 Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@redhat.com>
For a once-off, that makes more sense.

On 23/11/2011 14:47, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 12:40 PM, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> Starting the console from a script is not really an option, IMO.
>
> In general no - there is no plan to drop direct access using a URL and no plan to drop
> existing HTTP authentication.
>
> The starting from a script idea is more for the scenario of how do we connect to a secured
> system and authenticate so we can add a user to that system when there are no users
> currently defined on that system.
>
>> On 23/11/2011 14:17, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2011 12:10 PM, Heiko Braun wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK the CLI checks if you are on localhost. In that case the authentication is not
>>>> required.
>>>
>>> That is correct, I am just writing an article to send round with the
>>> details.
>>>
>>> The CLI will have authenticated against the server but as you are local
>>> to the server it will have used a silent authentication mechanism.
>>>
>>>> @Wondering if that works for the console as well?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately no the console has a different set of issues as the web
>>> browser doesn't have access to the filesystem, I am considering if we
>>> can start the console from a script to pass some form of token but at
>>> the moment the console does retain the need for a username and password.
>>>
>>>> Ike
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 23, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Francesco Marchioni wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all !
>>>>> In the release notes it's mentioned that management interfaces will be secured by
>>>>> default, however in the very first test I did, no authentication was asked. (Although
>>>>> in the configuration there is a ManagementRealm associated with the management
>>>>> interfaces).
>>>>> Have I hit a bug ?
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Francesco
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>>> jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>>> jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>>> jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>

--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dimitris Andreadis
Software Engineering Manager
JBoss Application Server
by Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://dandreadis.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev