I will add in that I am happy to work on this landing page, show me where to start.

I will add that a landing page that welcomes you is key, everyone is doing it.  Find me an App Server that doesn't, okay a mainstream on in the top 5.  We are not GA so we do not count ;P.

This landing page should point out the admin console is here.
Docs are here.
Trouble tickets can be raise here.
etc

in the future, if someone is asking for more usability, pretty please find a way to incorporate it.  I will and our customers in the future will appreciate it

Jim Tyrrell
Senior JBoss Solutions Architect

Did you see RHT on CNBC's Mad Money?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/39401056



On Apr 18, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Jason T. Greene wrote:

On 4/18/11 9:56 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 04/18/2011 09:51 AM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
If we're going to do it as a true deployment (i.e. one that shows up in
the config file's<deployments>   section and not a hack like we did in
Alpha1 for the jdbc rars) then we need to do JBAS-9020 and treat it as
"unmanaged" content

<deployment name="ROOT.war" runtime-name="ROOT.war">
      <fs-archive path="ROOT.war"
relative-to="jboss.server.system.content.dir"/>
</deployment>

Treating it as managed content ain't gonna fly.

<!-- No way!
<deployment name="ROOT.war" runtime-name="ROOT.war">
     <content id="d37ede977b022a1456ec5e7a5eee07549cb1c414"/>
</deployment>
-->

Yeah this is what I was getting at.  To Remy's point though we will
probably want a nice name like "jboss-welcome.war" or something.


Yeah I agree that 9020 is the way to go IF it makes sense as a deployment.

--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev