Mark Little wrote:
Is it possible to play tricks with the EIS name? I suspect that N(EIS) <<< N(nodes), so maybe we can require EIS names to be maintained in a configuration file and index that by 2 bits in the bqual. OK, maybe 2 bits is too small, but you get my meaning ;)
Yeah that's a good idea. What we're looking for isn't so much the node name as it is a reproducable identifier for the connection, right?