I am sure there are a tons of other more important things to do at this stage than discussing a hot deployment file-based API, so yes, if anyone has a different opinion can go ahead and implement it. On the other hand, independently of the underlying technical restrictions that suggest a certain design over another,I think the issue with this thread is that there doesn't seem to be an agreement as to what are the requirements. Without it, no matter what you implement, it is not going to be accepted.