Ales Justin wrote:
OK, I think I now understand where this is going. :-)
Who will then change the no-interface view and singleton binder / deployer to use this new naming schema?
Should I do this or will you do it?
Me :) If we decide to go for this approach. I have asked Carlo to provide some of his inputs here.
Ales Justin wrote:
What's the EJB name in this case -- from JBossSessionBeanMetaData?
JBossSessionBeanMetaData::getEjbName?
Yes.