Anyone going to complain if I break things? The current naming convention is:
String getFoo(); // returns a class name
but keeping that means introducing e.g.
Foo getFooInstance();
whereas I think we would be better off in the long run with
String getFooName() || String getFooClassname() || String getFooClassName()
Foo getFoo();
In the short term however that's going to break every existing config file. Again. I can probably fix the jbossts-properties.xml ones by adding a kludge to the properties loading code, but that still leaves a compatibility problem with existing -beans.xml files.