JBoss Community

Allessio

I'm at the point where I think I have correctly configured the metadata to include the handler. In my example, I have an existing handler (org.my.simple.server.MyServerHandler) defined by a @HandlerChain annotation on the WS impl. I then add another Handler (org.jboss.as.xts.TXFrameworkHandler) to the mapping at deployment time in my DUP.

I put a breakpoint in WSIntegrationProcessorJAXWS_HANDLER#processAnnotation, on the following line:

final WSEndpointHandlersMapping mapping = getRequiredAttachment(unit, WS_ENDPOINT_HANDLERS_MAPPING_KEY);

The debugger provides the following output:

mapping = {org.jboss.as.webservices.injection.WSEndpointHandlersMapping@626}

     endpointHandlersMap = {java.util.HashMap@646} size = 1

          Re: Can I modify the HandlerChain at deploy time? = {java.util.HashMap$Entry@653} org.my.simple.server.EchoServiceImpl -> org.my.simple.server.MyServerHandler, org.jboss.as.xts.TXFrameworkHandler

               key: java.lang.String = {java.lang.String@657}"org.my.simple.server.EchoServiceImpl"

               value: java.util.HashSet = {java.util.HashSet@627} size = 2

                    Re: Can I modify the HandlerChain at deploy time? = {java.lang.String@638}"org.my.simple.server.MyServerHandler"

                    Re: Can I modify the HandlerChain at deploy time? = {java.lang.String@664}"org.jboss.as.xts.TXFrameworkHandler"

So, it looks to me like I have setup the WSEndpointHandlersMapping correctly. However, The only handler that is invoked is the MyServerHandler. I've tried removing this handler from the set, in my DUP, and it is still invoked. This suggests to me that I'm either adding the wrong informtion, or doing it too late.

The order in which the relevent (IMO) DUPS are invoked is as follows:

1. WSHandlerChainAnnotationProcessor
2. TXFrameworkDeploymentProcessor (mine)
3. WSIntegrationProcessorJAXWS_HANDLER
4. WSRefAnnotationProcessor

In particular, here's the relavent (IMO) Phase priorities:

Do you have any idea why the WSEndpointHandlersMapping seems to be ignored?

Thanks,

Paul.