yes, I didn't quite like using varargs like that before, not just because of the way
IDEs deal with it but also how it becomes misleading on javadocs, since it implies that
the varargs are "necessary". That still stands, but at least it provides a
cleaner approach to using thread-locals. :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205939#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...