"alesj" wrote : | This is an old discussion, that as I see it now, never got properly resolved: | http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=146461 | Isn't there a better solution for this problem? I know can get rid of the overhead by mapping the module to the exported classes. But this means relying on implementation detail I shouldn't even be aware of. "Ales" wrote : | How else would a call to ClassLoader::getResource("META-INF/some-config.xml") work? ;-) | But if somebody puts SomeClass.class in META-INF, the class loader will be able of loading META-INF.SomeClass. I know this scenario is totallly awkward and should never happen, but aren't we supposed to cover corner cases? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267792#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...