From:jboss-development-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:jboss-development-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Andrig T Miller
Sent: 29 November 2006 23:05
To: Scott M Stark
Cc: Scott M Stark; JBoss.org development list; JavaEE-TCK; Ivelin Ivanov
Subject: [jboss-dev] Re: Fwd: AS 5 Beta 2 Discussion
I agree. In fact, we specifically created 4.2 for these types of issues. With the inclusion of EJB 3 in 4.2 as fully supported technology, we should make this as clean as possible.
Andy
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:11 -0800, Scott M Stark wrote:
Yes, its work to align the remoting uses. This has to be done for
jboss5, and ejb3 pulls this issue into 4.2. I don't see keeping the
legacy remoting layers as default as beneficial for 4.2.
Tom Elrod wrote:
>> 2. A related issue is alignment on jboss-remoting transports. There was
>> a jira issue to make the pooled invoker the default. The real question
>> is why don't we move to the unified invoker based on remoting to align
>> the transports between 4.2/5/ejb3.
>
> I was thinking the main reason we didn't switch to using unified
> invokers for 4.x was due to needing to update docs and training
> materials (since config would be completely different). However, if
> this is not an issue and would prefer to switch default to be unified
> invoker for 4.2, the change to standardjboss.xml, jboss-service.xml,
> and cluster-service.xml is simple (but still have the issue of where
> else needs to be changed, such as client user tx, testsuite, jmx
> invoker, etc.).
Andrig (Andy) Miller
VP, Engineering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
|