And bean validation and jsf2. In and by themselves these specs are a leap forward our current stack (and everybody else's). And for the first time these specs (jpa 2, jsf 2, bv, cdi) have been designed to actually work naturally as a unified whole.

The framework war is over, welcome to the application stack war.   

On 12 sept. 2009, at 09:15, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen@redhat.com> wrote:

JPA2, CDI/WebBeans and JBoss Embedded is not enough for you ? ;)

/max

Robb Greathouse wrote:
Hi,

I am putting together a workshop for JBoss AS 5.x.  I am looking for some real wow factors.  And frankly, even after talking to the core developers (who agree) I am not finding any wow factors.








Robb Greathouse 
JBoss 
CELL 505-507-4906 
OFFICE 505-255-2652 
FAX 505-554-2834 
SKYPE rgreathouse 




----- "Shelly McGowan" <smcgowan@redhat.com> wrote:

  
Jason,


RE:
    
Also, let me know if you have a component you would like to 
update/include that has low impact.
        
jboss-test and jboss-server-manager currently include alpha releases;
specifically,

<groupId>org.jboss.test</groupId>
        <artifactId>jboss-test</artifactId>
        <version>1.1.5-alpha-2</version>

<groupId>org.jboss.jbossas</groupId>
        <artifactId>jboss-server-manager</artifactId>
        <version>1.0.3-alpha-2</version>


These were needed as part of ALRs new bootstrap implementation
(JBASM-30, JBASM-31). Are these alpha versions acceptable
for the Beta1 release or would you prefer .GA?  


Shelly

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
    
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
  
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development