| "ron" wrote: |
... Is there anything wrong with HARMIClient and HARMIServer, other than the fact that they depend on RMI? --- |
| "brian" wrote: |
Not particularly, no. I think the main issues are 1) we want to unify as much as possible on a single remote invocation mechanism 2) get rid of myriad sockets opened by different services. I suppose the latter goes beyond the description of this JIRA as it involve converting HANamingService to use a Remoting connector instead of directly listening on port 1101. |
| "ron" wrote: |
It looks like there are two kinds of Naming listeners: 1. the "bootstrap" listeners in org.jnp.server.Main and org.jboss.ha.jndi.HANamingService, and 2. the actual service listeners: org.jnp.server.NamingServer and org.jboss.ha.framework.server.HARMIServerImpl So, we'd like to replace them all with handlers on a single Remoting connector (or, actually, the Remoting 3 version of of handlers and connectors). |
| "brian" wrote: |
The bootstrap listener part probably bears discussion on the jboss-dev list since it much more directly impacts stuff like end-user configuration (i.e. jndi.properties or other ways of setting the properties passed to new InitialContext()). The service listeners are more straightforward. |