Isn't the default config supposed to contain services that are commonly used by majority of users? juddi service does not fit the bill IMO.

> I was talking about this with Dimitris some time ago (actually a lot > of time ago...sorry). What about having juddi-service in the default > conf? Opinions? > Cheers > Alessio > > Dimitris Andreadis wrote: >> I wouldn't change that in AS 4.2, but for AS5 this is something we >> could discuss either on the dev-list or on the forums. Do you want >> to start a thread? >> >> Alessio Soldano wrote: >>> Well, I don't know which is the rule to choose what goes to >>> "default" and what only to "all". This said, it's true in my >>> opinion that uddi is not so used by users. Anyway if you want to >>> add juddi to default conf, I don't see any problem (as a matter of >>> fact we add it when deploying jbossws over an existing jboss >>> instance). >>> Cheers >>> Alessio >>> >>> Dimitris Andreadis ha scritto: >>>> The last run showed 6 remaining failures, the jaxr ones. I saw >>>> juddi-service.sar will be copied in the default/deploy dir, so I >>>> suppose the next run will be clean. >>>> >>>> Why we don't include juddi-service.sar in the default config. Is >>>> it because it's not always necessary with WS? >>>> >>>> Alessio Soldano wrote: >>>>> Hi Rajesh, >>>>> - the json failures should now be fixed (missing jettison.jar in >>>>> the AS thirdparty). I'm waiting for the next build of the AS on >>>>> hudson >>>>> - the jaxr tests fail because there's not a juddi service in the >>>>> default conf; I think we should exclude them in that job, run >>>>> against a jboss configuration having the juddi-service (perhaps >>>>> "all"), or deploy juddi before running those tests >>>>> - the jbws1814 should be fixed too (a X509 certificate expired, I >>>>> simply updated it with another one which just have an expiration >>>>> time far in the future) >>>>> - the enums test has now a fixme; I've spoken with Darran as it >>>>> seems to be related to some work he has been doing recently on >>>>> jbossxb. New version of jbossxb pointed out that that test is not >>>>> written in the right way and need to be rewritten. >>>>> I didn't create a new tag for the last 2 points because no real >>>>> changes were performed. >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Alessio >>>>> >>>>> Rajesh Rajasekaran ha scritto: >>>>>> Hi Alessio >>>>>> >>>>>> The job is configured to run on the tag for the version >>>>>> installed in AS-4.2.x >>>>>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossws/stack/native/tags/jbossws-native-3.0.... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If there is a new tag or any changes done in the branch to >>>>>> accommodate any fixes you make, please let me know, >>>>>> i can change accordingly. Every run uses the latest build of AS >>>>>> from Branch_4_2. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Rajesh >>>>>> >>>>>> Alessio Soldano wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Dimitris, >>>>>>> I'm working on this. The wsse failure is fixed, currently >>>>>>> looking at the other ones. >>>>>>> I'll let you know as soon as possible. >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> Alessio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dimitris Andreadis ha scritto: >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any update on: >>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5726 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need to wrap things up ASAP! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> /Dimitris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development