Looking at our maven repository, their seems to be a large variety of conventions on where to put packages. Even the same package exists in multiple locations. Has it been decided where packages are supposed to be?

OK. I will start putting everything there. Is there a plan to relocate everything under jboss, or are we going to leave those versions around for backwards compatibility? On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:25 -0500, Paul Gier wrote: > I'd like to follow the maven conventions and put projects under the groupId of > "org.jboss.<project>". Basically the base package name of the classes should be > used as the groupId. > > The projects that are under groupId "jboss" is how we were doing it before. > > > Jason T. Greene wrote: >> Looking at our maven repository, their seems to be a large variety of >> conventions on where to put packages. Even the same package exists in >> multiple locations. >> >> Has it been decided where packages are supposed to be? >> > _______________________________________________ > jboss-development mailing list > jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development