I managed to figure out the problem. My package contained a POJO jar model which seems to poison the entire package and as a result none of my process defintions are available in the jbpm console.
The jar contained multiple features such as generics and one of the classes (called 'Field') was abstract. I reduced the jar to only contain the Field class and removed the "abstract" modifier. Still no result. The class looks like this:
package com.companyname.secretproject.common
import java.io.Serializable;
import org.json.simple.JSONAware;
import org.json.simple.JSONObject;
public class Field implements JSONAware, Serializable
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 8501917889951368463L;
public static class Params
{
public static final String DISPLAYABLE_NAME = "displayableName";
public static final String NAME = "name";
public static final String READONLY = "readonly";
public static final String REQUIRED = "required";
public static final String TYPE = "type";
}
protected String name;
protected String displayableName;
protected boolean readonly;
protected boolean required;
public String getName()
{
return name;
}
public void setName(String name)
{
this.name = name;
}
public String getDisplayableName()
{
return displayableName;
}
public void setDisplayableName(String displayableName)
{
this.displayableName = displayableName;
}
public boolean getReadonly()
{
return readonly;
}
public void setReadonly(boolean readonly)
{
this.readonly = readonly;
}
public boolean getRequired()
{
return required;
}
public void setRequired(boolean required)
{
this.required = required;
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public JSONObject toJSONObject()
{
JSONObject o = new JSONObject();
o.put(Params.DISPLAYABLE_NAME, displayableName);
o.put(Params.NAME, name);
o.put(Params.READONLY, readonly);
o.put(Params.REQUIRED, required);
o.put(Params.TYPE, this.getClass().getSimpleName());
return o;
}
@Override
public String toJSONString()
{
return this.toJSONObject().toJSONString();
}
}
My only idea is that the class name "Field" is somewhat reserved or the "problem" is that it implements an interface other than Serializable.
I would appreciate if someone could collect all the requirements for writing a domain specific POJO model.
Best regards,
Márton