Hi!
I changed the authenticator method, but there are no different results.
The log now looks like:
| 12:10:33,593 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-1) INFO 15-02 12:10:33,593 (DefaultAuthenticator.java:authenticate:39) | User logged in via default authentication module (no security check). |
| 12:10:34,171 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:34,171 (DefaultAuthenticator.java:authenticate:39) | User logged in via default authentication module (no security check). |
| 12:10:36,078 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:36,078 (DefaultAuthenticator.java:authenticate:39) | User logged in via default authentication module (no security check). |
| 12:10:36,078 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:36,078 (RepositoryServlet.java:allowUser:113) | admin authenticated for rest api |
| 12:10:36,093 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:36,093 (PackageDeploymentServlet.java:execute:134) | PackageName: pkg |
| 12:10:36,093 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:36,093 (PackageDeploymentServlet.java:execute:135) | PackageVersion: LATEST |
| 12:10:36,093 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:36,093 (PackageDeploymentServlet.java:execute:136) | PackageIsLatest: true |
| 12:10:36,093 INFO [stdout] (http--127.0.0.1-8080-4) INFO 15-02 12:10:36,093 (PackageDeploymentServlet.java:execute:137) | PackageIsSource: false |
I erased all packages and made a new one with all the needed assets; the package is built, and it seems to be authenticated.
This log is written when I open jbpm-console (12:10:33) and then when I try to get the process definitions (12:10:36). As you can see, the console seems to be connected to guvnor because it analyses the package.
I think maybe the communication is ok, and the problem is my package. So I am analysing the package. When I download the package source, I found just a declaration of the package:
package pkg
import com.sample.Compra
I think I should see something referred to the process, shouldn't I ?
Thanks in advance,
Roger